Ted cruz climate change galileo biography

By the late s, research had established that the warming associated with greenhouse gases was dominant over the cooling effect of aerosols. A study published in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society by climate scientists and a journalist in said there was no scientific consensus in the s that the world was cooling.

Ted cruz climate change galileo biography

The researchers pointed to a report from the National Research Councilpart of the National Academiesthat warned about the dangers of continuing to emit carbon dioxide by burning fossil fuels and associated warming. The Year Cherry-Pick. Cruz, March The satellite data demonstrate that there has been no significant warming whatsoever for 17 years.

Seventeen years ago wasone of the hottest years since recording began. That year, the average global temperature was 0. Inconsidered by several research organizations including NOAA and NASA as the most likely candidate for warmest on record, the temperature was 0. It would be just as easy, however, to pick out much cooler years as a starting point to show a sharp increase in temperatures.

Starting one year earlier or later — at 0. This would represent as much as 31 percent of all warming the world has seen sincewhen record keeping began. In fact, there was an expedition that went down to Antarctica to prove that the polar ice caps were melting They are larger than they were. So not only was Kerry incorrect, he was spectacularly absolutely opposite the facts.

But in pointing that out, Cruz distorts the facts by referring to a ship that got stuck in Antarctic ice a world away near the South Pole. Scientists do say it's only a matter of decades before the sea ice around the North Pole will be melted during the summer months, and some countries' navies are already exploring the area for quicker sea routes.

Scientific measurements in Antarctica - where thick ice sheets sit atop land, not floating on the ocean as in the Arctic - show the ice sheets are diminishing on one side while growing on the other. But the fact that a ship got stuck in ice in the Antarctica doesn't tell us anything about the phenomenon. CRUZ: "If you're a big-government politician, if you want more power, climate change is the perfect pseudo-scientific theory This is a highly developed science.

CRUZ: "Thirty, 40 years ago a whole bunch of liberal politicians, a bunch of scientists, were advocating, they said we were facing global cooling. But the likelihood of this occurring is slim to none, as the theory has been verified time and again since it was first proposed by the physicist Joseph Fourier in Another way to disprove climate change would be to challenge the theory of global warming, adds Mann.

But scientists have found no evidence to support this claim. As we have written beforethe U. And d oes the theory of climate change entail a fallacy? In this case, the fallacy is unfalsifiability. Scientists have found strong evidence that suggests anthropogenic causes, like the burning of fossil fuels, contribute to changes in our climate in addition to natural causes.

In the U. Global Change Research Program, May : Long-term, independent records from weather stations, satellites, ocean buoys, tide gauges, and many other data sources all confirm that our nation [the United States], like the rest of the world, is warming. Precipitation patterns are changing, sea level is rising, the oceans are becoming more acidic, and the frequency and intensity of some extreme weather events are increasing.

Many lines of independent evidence demonstrate that the rapid warming of the past half-century is due primarily to human activities. For example, the U. Recent climate changes have had widespread impacts on human and natural systems. This is inaccurate. Scientists have found plenty of evidence to suggest that humans have been contributing to climate change since the Industrial Revolution.